In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Muni mutual funds see inflows, led again by long-term, high-yield
More single-family built-for-rent homes are under construction in the U.S.
DOT needs help from Congress for TOD funding
Muni lobby stakes out positions in tax fight
Starboard loses initial legal fight against Autodesk, but the battle may just be beginning