News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Bill Gross says the surging 10-year Treasury yield could test 5% in the short term
The Truth Behind Cuba’s Bitcoin Revolution: An on-the-ground report
Price analysis 9/29: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, DOGE, SOL, TON, DOT, MATIC
Bill Ackman reportedly said he would ‘absolutely’ do a deal with X with his new SPARC funding vehicle
Congressmen urge FRA to reject Texas high-speed rail grants