News

“It is not contrary to reason,” wrote David Hume, the 18th century Scottish philosopher, “for me to chuse my total ruin, to prevent the least uneasiness of an Indian or person wholly unknown to me.” The US, the UK, the EU and Nato have all said they will not directly intervene militarily to prevent the “uneasiness” of even some hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians (“Investigators start to gather evidence of possible atrocities against civilians”, Report, April 5).

But is there a threshold number for those suffering horrendous deaths — 5mn, 10mn or 20mn — which, if reached, leads the west to intervene, be it through reason, compassion or perceived self-interest?

And if that happens, what have we to say to those who were allowed to suffer and die before that threshold was reached?

Peter Cave
London W1, UK

Articles You May Like

Trump found in contempt of court in Manhattan ‘hush money’ case
As home sellers, buyers wait on a Fed cut, here’s how mortgage rates have impacted the spring housing market
Microsoft and Alphabet enjoy AI-powered gains from cloud divisions
Issuers to bring $7B amid FOMC week; munis outperform for now
Large new-issues close out April led by Novant health, Port Authority of NY&NJ